These examples are programmatically compiled from various online sources to illustrate current usage of the word 'hands-off.' Any opinions expressed in the examples do not represent those of Merriam-Webster or its editors. We must not get rid of restraints, but make sure there is a. 2023 Moreover, the Swiss authorities have cultivated a pointedly hands-off approach to regulation. Yes, restraint can be used irresponsibly, but hands off policies can also be used irresponsibly to the child’s ultimate detriment. 2023 Going hands-off For driving control, the Ariya is the first Nissan product in the US market to offer ProPilot Assist 2.0. 2023 Unlike pimples, a hands-off approach won't necessarily make the itchy, flaky, irritated patches go away. 2023 As the attitude toward Syria in the region has shifted, the administration of President Biden has taken a more hands-off approach. Christopher Michel, Country Living, According to Tesla, Huang’s hands were not detected on the steering wheel multiple times during the 19 minutes leading up to the crash, during which Autopilot issued two visual and one audible alert for hands-off driving. correctional law which held that the law did not follow the convicted offenders into the prison. Patrick George, The Verge, Cook the homemade sauce a day or two in advance, and the rest of the recipe is mostly hands-off. The hands-off doctrine was a dominated thinking about the U.S. Origin 1815-25 French (allow to act) Laissez Faire Example in Leadership A laissez faire attitude may apply to more than just governments’ relationship with private party transactions. David Hilzenrath, USA TODAY, On the consumer side, the next big thing will be the Ultra Cruise ADAS system, which also offers hands-off driving so long as the human pilot is paying attention. Noun A system of government or other leadership that takes a hands off approach to issues and transactions between private parties. “But we don’t need to cause people more pain in order to help them.Recent Examples on the Web The federal government has generally taken a hands-off approach. “It was really hard for me not to vote for all the good things in that bill,” Simmons said. Judges in municipal courts around the state could keep punishing those struggling with addiction, she said. Hayes says retailers are increasingly counting on technology - not people - to stop retail theft. Tarra Simmons, of Bremerton, who spent time in prison on drug charges before becoming a lawyer and a lawmaker, said she was willing to vote to make it a misdemeanor as part of a compromise that would increase services.īut a gross misdemeanor is actually worse than its old status as a felony, she suggested, because the felony came with a sentencing recommendation of zero to six months for the first three offenses the gross misdemeanor is up to a year in jail. Many liberal Democrats, meanwhile, said they were opposed to making drug possession a crime at all. “But not requiring them to acknowledge they have a problem is not the right path to go.” Greg Cheney, R-Battle Ground, a lawyer with experience in drug courts, said during a floor debate last month. “I want these people to get better,” said Rep. It would have made clear that public health workers could not be prosecuted for giving out drug paraphernalia, such as clean glass tubes for smoking fentanyl.Īnd it would have included funding for drug crisis centers a pilot program for health engagement hubs where users could access clean drug paraphernalia and connect with other services and expanded access to withdrawal medication in jails and prisons. Judges could impose jail time for people who refuse treatment or repeatedly fail to comply. It also would have eliminated the requirement that police refer a person’s first two offenses for treatment rather than prosecution, enabling officers to arrest someone for a first offense if they thought it appropriate, while also encouraging police and prosecutors to divert cases. Hand-Off will be an invaluable resource for scholars, students, policy analysts, and general readers seeking to understand afresh the Bush administrations. It would have increased potential penalties for drug possession, making it a gross misdemeanor punishable by up to a year in jail, rather than a misdemeanor punishable by up to 90 days. But as this year’s session ended late last month, a measure billed as a compromise was voted down in the Democratic-controlled House 55-43.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |